Skip to main content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.
"Predatory" publishers present themselves as legitimate Open Access publishers but use questionable publishing practices such as:
using an inadequate or incomplete peer review process
focusing mainly on collecting article processing charges rather than quality scholarship
masking the true identity of journal staff and the actual fees required for publication.
How do you check the authority of these publishers?
Think. Check. Submit. It is an easy-to-use tool to help you identify trustworthy publication venues for your research. It provides a simple checklist to help you assess the credentials of a journal or publisher.
Some helpful tips and questions to consider:
Look for publishers full and verifiable contact information, including address on the journal site. Be cautious if only a web contact form is provided
Does the editorial board list recognized experts with full affiliations? Ask them about their experiences with the journal or publisher
Check that the journal prominently displays its policy for author fees
Be wary of email invitations to submit to journals or become editorial board members
Read some of the journal's published articles and assess their quality. Contact past authors to ask about their experience
Check that the journal's peer review process is clearly described and try to confirm that a claimed impact factor is correct
Is the journal a member of an industry association such as Directory of Open Access Journals, or the Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association? ( doaj.org; oaspa.org)
Further reading & guidelines